On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:13:13PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > This fixes a regression from > > commit 57779d06367a915ee03e6cb918d7575f0a46e419 > Author: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > Date: Wed Oct 31 17:50:14 2012 +0200 > > drm/i915: Fix display pixel format handling > > (which even says that they are supported on Ironlake, and then promptly > rejects then...) Sorry about that. I do remember changing the condition when changing the commit message, but I must have made an error when resolving conflicts during one of the rebases the patch went through. > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index de09f47..211a097 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -8332,7 +8332,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, > case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY: > case DRM_FORMAT_YVYU: > case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY: > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6) > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) > return -EINVAL; > break; > default: > -- > 1.7.10.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel OTC
