On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:33:01PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:46:00 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > @@ -1087,6 +1087,9 @@ i915_error_first_batchbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > if (!ring->get_seqno) > > return NULL; > > > > + if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev_priv->dev)) > > + return i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, ring->private); > > Hmm, this is complicated by userspace opting out of the CS w/a, and > imposes quite a burden upon our simple seq interface. Right, I've written this without userspace being able to opt out in mind ... for the seq -ENOMEM, I guess it's just time to bite the bullet. Loads of the error_states for the ilk fallout couldn't be dumped (but could be captured) by bug reporters already :( -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
