[PATCH 0/6] ring seqno wrap handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:05:42PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue,  4 Dec 2012 15:11:59 +0200, Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > As Ben suggested, explicitly syncing across wrap boundary
> > revealed yet another set of issues that gem_stress didn't find.
> > 
> > So here is a patchset which addresses the syncing problems
> > across wrap boundary. Chris helped me to carve out seqno handling
> > ugliness from my initial attempts to handle the ring wrapping.
> > 
> > As I can't break this anymore, i added 6/6.
> > --Mika
> > 
> > Mika Kuoppala (6):
> >   drm/i915: Fix debugfs seqno info print to use uint
> >   drm/i915: Don't emit semaphore wait if wrap happened
> >   drm/i915: Split intel_ring_begin
> >   drm/i915: Add intel_ring_handle_seqno wrap
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> >   drm/i915: Add debugfs entry to read/write next_seqno
> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Merged them all, thanks for patches&review.
> 
> >   drm/i915: Set initial seqno value close to wrap boundary
> *washes hands*

I'm feeling stupid/lucky/bold/whatever, also merged.

/me hides

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux