[PATCH v2] drm/i915: fix color order for BGR formats on IVB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 08/22/12 12:17, Vijay Purushothaman wrote:
> This is already fixed for ILK and SNB in the below commit but somehow
> IVB is missed.
> 
> commit ab2f9df10dd955f1fc0a8650e377588c98f1c029
> Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> Date:   Mon Feb 27 12:40:10 2012 -0800
> 
>     drm/i915: fix color order for BGR formats on SNB
> 
> Had the wrong bits and field definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Purushothaman <vijay.a.purushothaman at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Lin <ben.y.lin at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index cc8df4d..6045a01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -54,17 +54,17 @@ ivb_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>  
>  	/* Mask out pixel format bits in case we change it */
>  	sprctl &= ~SPRITE_PIXFORMAT_MASK;
> -	sprctl &= ~SPRITE_RGB_ORDER_RGBX;
> +	sprctl &= ~SPRITE_RGB_ORDER_XBGR;
Are you sure about this? Where is the #define for _XBGR?

>  	sprctl &= ~SPRITE_YUV_BYTE_ORDER_MASK;
>  	sprctl &= ~SPRITE_TILED;
>  
>  	switch (fb->pixel_format) {
>  	case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888:
> -		sprctl |= SPRITE_FORMAT_RGBX888;
> +		sprctl |= SPRITE_FORMAT_RGBX888 | SPRITE_RGB_ORDER_RGBX;
>  		pixel_size = 4;
>  		break;
>  	case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
> -		sprctl |= SPRITE_FORMAT_RGBX888 | SPRITE_RGB_ORDER_RGBX;
> +		sprctl |= SPRITE_FORMAT_RGBX888;
>  		pixel_size = 4;
>  		break;
>  	case DRM_FORMAT_YUYV:

-- 
- Antti


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux