Hi all,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:08:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
>
> between commit:
>
> e742a17cd360 ("drm/sun4i: tcon: Reduce the scope of the LVDS error a bit")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 6664e9dc5383 ("drm/sun4i: Add support for A80 TCONs")
>
> from the drm-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> index abdc6ad6b384,d3a945b7bb60..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
> @@@ -176,7 -176,7 +176,8 @@@ struct sun4i_tcon_quirks
> bool has_channel_1; /* a33 does not have channel 1 */
> bool has_lvds_alt; /* Does the LVDS clock have a parent other than the TCON clock? */
> bool needs_de_be_mux; /* sun6i needs mux to select backend */
> + bool supports_lvds; /* Does the TCON support an LVDS output? */
> + bool needs_edp_reset; /* a80 edp reset needed for tcon0 access */
>
> /* callback to handle tcon muxing options */
> int (*set_mux)(struct sun4i_tcon *, const struct drm_encoder *);
This is now a conflict between the drm tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp0oAFrB9yQm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
