Quoting Jeff McGee (2018-03-22 15:34:45) > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:35:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Using engine->irq_posted for execlists, we are not always serialised by > > the tasklet as we supposed. On the reset paths, the tasklet is disabled > > and ignored. Instead, we manipulate the engine->irq_posted directly to > > account for the reset, but if an interrupt fired before the reset and so > > wrote to engine->irq_posted, that write may not be flushed from the > > local CPU's cacheline until much later as the tasklet is already active > > and so does not generate a mb(). To correctly serialise the interrupt > > with reset, we need serialisation on the set_bit() itself. > > > > And at last Mika can be happy. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 7 +++---- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > index fa7310766217..27aee25429b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > @@ -1405,10 +1405,9 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir) > > bool tasklet = false; > > > > if (iir & GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT) { > > - if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) { > > - __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted); > > - tasklet = true; > > - } > > + if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) > > + tasklet = !test_and_set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, > > + &engine->irq_posted); > > } > > > > if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) { > > -- > > 2.16.2 > > > > Confirmed that this along with the interrupt flush eliminates the cases > of finding CSB tail at its reset value (0x7) in the tasklet in my force > preemption tests. At the moment, I'm concerned about the failures we have in CI before we go building on top. So care to complete the set of r-b for us to move on? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx