> -----Original Message----- > From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:35 PM > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported > format for primary plane > > On 23.02.2018 05:06, Srinivas, Vidya wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:06 PM > >> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > >> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as > >> supported format for primary plane > >> > >> On 22.02.2018 04:39, Srinivas, Vidya wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila@xxxxxxxxx] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:52 PM > >>>> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > >>>> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as > >>>> supported format for primary plane > >>>> > >>>> On 21.02.2018 12:20, Vidya Srinivas wrote: > >>>>> From: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> This patch adds NV12 to list of supported formats for primary > >>>>> plane > >>>>> > >>>>> v2: Rebased (Chandra Konduru) > >>>>> > >>>>> v3: Rebased (me) > >>>>> > >>>>> v4: Review comments by Ville addressed Removed the > >>>>> skl_primary_formats_with_nv12 and added NV12 case in existing > >>>>> skl_primary_formats > >>>>> > >>>>> v5: Rebased (me) > >>>>> > >>>>> v6: Missed the Tested-by/Reviewed-by in the previous series Adding > >>>>> the same to commit message in this version. > >>>>> > >>>>> v7: Review comments by Ville addressed > >>>>> Restricting the NV12 for BXT and on PIPE A and B Rebased (me) > >>>>> > >>>>> v8: Rebased (me) > >>>>> Modified restricting the NV12 support for both BXT and KBL. > >>>>> > >>>>> v9: Rebased (me) > >>>>> > >>>>> v10: Addressed review comments from Maarten. > >>>>> Adding NV12 inside skl_primary_formats itself. > >>>>> > >>>>> v11: Adding Reviewed By tag from Shashank Sharma > >>>>> > >>>>> Tested-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++ > >>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >>>>> index 142dfe0..1870366 100644 > >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static const uint32_t skl_primary_formats[] = { > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_YVYU, > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_UYVY, > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_VYUY, > >>>>> + DRM_FORMAT_NV12, > >>>>> }; > >>>>> > >>>>> static const uint64_t skl_format_modifiers_noccs[] = { @@ > >>>>> -13282,6 > >>>>> +13283,10 @@ intel_primary_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private > >>>> *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe) > >>>>> intel_primary_formats = skl_primary_formats; > >>>>> num_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_primary_formats); > >>>>> > >>>>> + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 9 && pipe == PIPE_C) > && > >>>>> + !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) > >>>>> + num_formats -= 1; > >>>> > >>>> This doesn't look future proof solution. This creates invisible > >>>> dependency where it is required NV12 is last item in list of formats. > >>> > >>> Initially we had a different array for this. But as a part of one of > >>> the review comments, I made this change. > >> > >> I did see Maarten's comment on your older patch. In my opinion having > >> two lists would be more clear. Regardless of opinions on which is > >> better you maybe anyway want to reconsider this piece of code as this > >> expose > >> NV12 also for Skylake platform. > > > > Maarten, could you please add your inputs as well? > > I will change the patch according to what we decide. > > Thank you. > > If other's see it better to keep it in one list I'm ok for that. To me it just feel > like accident waiting to happen if this list is changed at later time for different > reasons. > > My other comment about Skylake platform, you shouldn't enable NV12 for > Skylake platform where its documented to have problems (I mean not all > users of skl_* list but rule out probably something like IS_SKYLAKE(..)). For > this reason this patch shouldn't be used as is. > This same story applies for patch #14 of this series, NV12 shouldn't be > enabled on Skylake platform. Thank you. Sure, I will just wait for Maarten's input on the array. For SKL, I will make the change in the patch and float. Regards Vidya > > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> + > >>>>> if (skl_plane_has_ccs(dev_priv, pipe, > PLANE_PRIMARY)) > >>>>> modifiers = skl_format_modifiers_ccs; > >>>>> else > >>>>> > >>> > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
