At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:33:37 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> > --- > include/drm/drm_edid.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > index bcb9a66..8cefbbe 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > @@ -90,12 +90,26 @@ struct detailed_data_monitor_range { > u8 min_hfreq_khz; > u8 max_hfreq_khz; > u8 pixel_clock_mhz; /* need to multiply by 10 */ > - __le16 sec_gtf_toggle; /* A000=use above, 20=use below */ > - u8 hfreq_start_khz; /* need to multiply by 2 */ > - u8 c; /* need to divide by 2 */ > - __le16 m; > - u8 k; > - u8 j; /* need to divide by 2 */ > + u8 flags; > + union { > + struct { > + u8 reserved; > + u8 hfreq_start_khz; /* need to multiply by 2 */ > + u8 c; /* need to divide by 2 */ > + __le16 m; > + u8 k; > + u8 j; /* need to divide by 2 */ > + } gtf2; > + struct { > + u8 version; > + u8 data1; /* high 6 bits: extra clock resolution */ > + u8 data2; /* plus low 2 of above: max hactive */ > + u8 supported_aspects; > + u8 flags; /* preferred aspect and blanking support */ > + u8 supported_scalings; > + u8 preferred_refresh; > + } cvt; These new structs must be marked with __attribute__((packed)) although the struct detailed_data_monitor_range itself is already marked. At least, with gcc 4.6 and x86-64 here, they get unaligned. thanks, Takashi > + } formula; > } __attribute__((packed)); > > struct detailed_data_wpindex { > -- > 1.7.7.6 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >