As we allow more buffers to be allocated to fill larger apertures, we may exceed the static allocation of 4096 buffers. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104669 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c b/tests/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c index 51f672fd9..693e96cec 100644 --- a/tests/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c +++ b/tests/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c @@ -98,16 +98,20 @@ check_bo(int fd, drm_intel_bo *bo, uint32_t start_val) } } -static void run_test (int fd, int count) +static void run_test(int fd, int count) { - drm_intel_bo *bo[4096]; - uint32_t bo_start_val[4096]; + drm_intel_bo **bo; + uint32_t *bo_start_val; uint32_t start = 0; int i; count |= 1; igt_info("Using %d 1MiB buffers\n", count); + bo = malloc(count * sizeof(*bo)); + bo_start_val = malloc(count * sizeof(*bo_start_val)); + igt_assert(bo && bo_start_val); + bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd, 4096); drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_reuse(bufmgr); batch = intel_batchbuffer_alloc(bufmgr, intel_get_drm_devid(fd)); @@ -158,6 +162,9 @@ static void run_test (int fd, int count) intel_batchbuffer_free(batch); drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr); + + free(bo_start_val); + free(bo); } #define MAX_32b ((1ull << 32) - 4096) -- 2.15.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
