On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 20:49, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > I'm honestly not too happy with this table, because somewhere in there > we'll have an annoying type, and there's almost zero chance we'll ever > find that. So I prefer if we can replicate the pixel clock computation > from some stupid excel sheet ... > The latest specs say that the table is the recommended way for configuring known clocks settings, for both iCLKIP and WR PLL, and the algorithm/formula should be used as fallback only. But I'll add them as well. One never knows when a new and previously unthinkable mode pops up :). -- Eugeni Dodonov <http://eugeni.dodonov.net/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120415/5cdfcfdb/attachment.html>
