On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 05:54:45PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:12:57 +0200 > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > They're indentical, so just kill one. Also give the other a prefix to > > distinguish it from the gen6+ functions - this add_request function is > > not really generic code. > > > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > The subject appears to indicate that you're consolidating ring->flush, > but I think you meant add_request. Oops, I'll fix this up when applying, thanks for catching this. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
