On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:12:45 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch series is inspired by Ben's ring->get|put_irq cleanup for gen6+ and > my perpetual hatred for intel_ringbuffer.c. > > It's a lot of churn, but the end result is imho worth it - I almost started to > like what the ringbuffer abstraction looks like now. There are some follow-up > cleanups possible, but I think that can wait until we've cleanup up our domain > tracking and ripped out the flushing_list (if that ever happens). > > Commments, flames and review highly welcome. It's not offensive. Cleaning up the function names and the initialisation is certainly worth it. Maybe I was just expecting more. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
