On 2017.11.21 12:20:00 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> All, the following fixes selected based on the Fixes: tag failed to
> backport to drm-next heading to v4.15.
>
> 8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")
>
ignore this one, it's a fix for one refactor patch for 4.16.
> This one I think shouldn't have included a Fixes: line in the first
> place. While technically a rename can be a fix, I consider Fixes: to
> indicate things that have a functional significance to the end user.
>
> f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path only")
I think this one is needed and will do backport.
> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, glk"")
>
> If these are needed in v4.15, please provide backports based on the
> drm-intel-next-fixes branch.
>
thanks for notify!
--
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.
$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
