On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:46:51PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > The actual refactoring patch are also ok, though I'd like for Daniel > to scope out who owns the seqno vs the request, especially in the light > of no-more-domains... I've thought a bit more about this and one great upside of seqnos over a simple pointer to the request is that we'd need to properly manage references to the latter. I.e. when we free a request we would need to ensure that anyone still referencing it is actually gone, and the current code is unfortunately quite far away from that :( I think we should keep this refactor idea in mind and look at it again after no-more-domains and after intel_ringbuffer.c has been simplified. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
