On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:40:19AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 02-11-17 om 17:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Thu, 02 Nov 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >>>> This interface is deprecated, and has been replaced by the upstream > >>>> drm crc interface. > >>> Before we nuke this I would like to see an option in the new interface > >>> to not filter out the "bad" CRCs. When analyzing how the hardware > >>> behaves seeing every CRC can be valuable. And I'm not at all convinced > >>> we should be dropping as many CRCs as we are currently. > >> I'm not against it, but do you have a concrete proposal on how that > >> option would look like? > > Some kind of of filter_bad_crcs file with a bool value perhaps? > > You can set sources, might as well add a nofilter option.. But I don't see what it has to do > with this patch? This problem existed since before the api was introduced.. Only difference > is kernel eats possibly corrupt CRCs now instead of IGT. I don't use igt for this. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
