On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 04:15:40AM +0000, Sun, Yi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to > > tests the qa process first. Highligths: > > - first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse > > - quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches > > - HAS_LLC param from Eugeni > > - kill i915_mem.c > > > > For easier testing there's also an updated drm-intel-testing branch with > > the latest -fixes merged in (i.e. the missed irq patches). Testing > > feedback highly welcome. > > > > Hi Yi, > > > > Please put the -testing branch through the kernel qa process. Btw I've > > noticed that the nightly tests are missing a few recent i-g-t tests, > > please upgrade that. > > > > I'm confused about branch drm-intel-testing. Does it mean drm-intel-next > branch when you said branch drm-intel-testing? drm-intel-testing is drm-intel-next and drm-intel-fixes merged together (as the time of when I've pushed things out). Gordon Jin said that he prefers to qa one single branch and that qa will take the job of finding out whether an issue has been introduced in -fixes or in -next. I agree that it makes more sense to test everything together, otherwise you'll miss some of the bugfixes in -fixes. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
