On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:19:35AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:39:44 -0400 > Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Matches the advice in the Sandybridge documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > index dcc7ae6..3ad90f6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > else > > aux_clock_divider = 225; /* eDP input clock at 450Mhz */ > > } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) > > - aux_clock_divider = 62; /* IRL input clock fixed at 125Mhz */ > > + aux_clock_divider = 63; /* IRL input clock fixed at 125Mhz */ > > else > > aux_clock_divider = intel_hrawclk(dev) / 2; > > I have no problem with this set; matching the docs is nice. However > we'll need to get some good test coverage before I feel comfortable. Ok, Jesse upped these noises of approval into acked-bys on irc. Queued all 3 patches for -next. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
