On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:52:31 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > - I think we need to amend the commit msg of the voodoo patch with the > piece of doc I've discovered. If you want I can send out a v3 with that. Sounds good. > - I think the HWSTAM revert is material for -next I'd be OK with pushing all of the SNB changes to -next and leaving the patches only affecting IVB, where we know it is necessary. Note that this branch wasn't written with an eye to merging to -fixes, but rather as what we want the code to look like eventually. As such, we need to identify separately 1) What needs to go into -fixes for 3.3. 2) What needs to go into -next for 3.4. > - Can you post your 3 patches on intel-gfx, I think I can shoot at them a > bit ;-) Sure; it's all a work in progress. > acc101d drm/i915: Hold gt_lock across forcewake register reads > > Imo this is a simple cleanup (reading forcewake-protected registers isn't > really a fast-path for us), so material for -next. The 'optimization' is just a side benefit. The fix is to prevent reads
