On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:40:36 -0800, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> On 12/29/2011 05:52 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > These registers are automatically incremented by the hardware during
> > transform feedback to track where the next streamed vertex output
> > should go. Unlike the previous generation, which had a packet for
> > setting the corresponding registers to a defined value, gen7 only has
> > MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM to do so. That's a secure packet (since it loads
> > an arbitrary register), so we need to do it from the kernel, and it
> > needs to be settable atomically with the batchbuffer execution so that
> > two clients doing transform feedback don't stomp on each others'
> > state.
> >
> > Instead of building a more complicated interface involcing setting the
> > registers to a specific value, just set them to 0 when asked and
> > userland can tweak its pointers accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt<eric at anholt.net>
> > +/** Resets the SO write offset registers for transform feedback on gen7. */
> > +#define I915_EXEC_GEN7_SOL_RESET (1<<8)
> > +
> > struct drm_i915_gem_pin {
> > /** Handle of the buffer to be pinned. */
> > __u32 handle;
>
> Is this something we want to carry long term wrt ABI. I really want to
> get context/ppgtt stuff out the door relatively soon (context should be
> ready to test really soon actually).
>
> I'm totally unfamiliar with this register, but is this what you want the
> interface to be permanently?
Ultimately, we want this ABI plus contexts. Until then, we can live
with this ABI alone.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120104/510ed2a1/attachment.pgp>
