Re: [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 September 2017 at 15:43, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 20 September 2017 at 09:03, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Hi Rodrigo,
>>
>> This pull request is generated wrongly, it contains some commits from
>> drm-next in it.
>
> Sorry contains some commits from drm-fixes in it.
>>
>> Please regenerate it, I'm assuming you generated against 4.14-rc1 and
>> not against drm-next.
>
> not against drm-fixes :-)

I believe the issue is that Rodrigo rebased drm-intel-fixes on top of
drm-fixes, not Linus' tags like we've used to do this. Rodrigo, when you
do this, you need to pass drm-fixes as the upstream for 'dim
pull-request-fixes'. It defaults to Linus' tree for the fixes pulls.

But going forward, I think we'll prefer Linus' tags as baseline for
fixes pulls like before. And I think the lesson is to always have a
sanity check glance at the shortlog.

Anyway, I promised better docs for Rodrigo and Joonas before -rc1, my
fail.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux