The only call of wait_for_engine() is wrapped in a GEM_WARN_ON macro, which confusingly suppresses the call unless CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM is set. According to http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg128768.html the current behavior is correct, even though it's not obvious. Different solutions to improve GEM_WARN_ON were discussed, but no conclusion was reached. Mark wait_for_engine() as maybe_unused to avoid a compiler warning, according to the above discussion this is still needed evein if GEM_WARN_ON is eventually refactored. Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 969bac8404f1..52d0b7d0082b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -3364,7 +3364,8 @@ static int wait_for_timeline(struct i915_gem_timeline *tl, unsigned int flags) return 0; } -static int wait_for_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int timeout_ms) +static __maybe_unused int wait_for_engine( + struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int timeout_ms) { return wait_for(intel_engine_is_idle(engine), timeout_ms); } -- 2.14.1.342.g6490525c54-goog _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
