On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:05:05 +0100, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote: > Maybe it'd be better to mention that actually setting bit-0 caused a > blank screen on some machines. Was that caused by *just* setting bit zero? Or was it caused by setting the duty cycle to 0xffff, in which case it would be larger than the maximum value? I'll clean up the commit log message with your answer and then push this out. -- keith.packard at intel.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20111119/dd38f958/attachment.pgp>
