Em Sex, 2017-03-31 às 21:00 +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
escreveu:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The clipped src coordinates have already been rotated by 270 degrees
> for
> when the plane rotation is 90/270 degrees, hence the FBC code should
> no
> longer swap the width and height.
I've never payed too much attention to rotation, but based on the
mentioned commits, what's said on the messages and my understanding of
the code, this looks sane, so:
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
And in case someone suggests to just kill
intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(), I'd like to point that "plane source
size" is wording used by our spec and there's a nice comment explaining
what exactly it's supposed to be, so I'd be in favor of keeping it.
Super bonus point if you end up writing some sort of rotation test for
kms_frontbuffer_tracking or kms_fbc_crc. The problem is that I'm not
entirely too sure about how much the current code structure for those
tests is ready to easily support such a test with minimal efforts.
Needs to be studied.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: b63a16f6cd89 ("drm/i915: Compute display surface offset in the
> plane check hook for SKL+")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> index ded2add18b26..d93c58410bff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> @@ -82,20 +82,10 @@ static unsigned int
> get_crtc_fence_y_offset(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> static void intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(struct
> intel_fbc_state_cache *cache,
> int *width, int *height)
> {
> - int w, h;
> -
> - if (drm_rotation_90_or_270(cache->plane.rotation)) {
> - w = cache->plane.src_h;
> - h = cache->plane.src_w;
> - } else {
> - w = cache->plane.src_w;
> - h = cache->plane.src_h;
> - }
> -
> if (width)
> - *width = w;
> + *width = cache->plane.src_w;
> if (height)
> - *height = h;
> + *height = cache->plane.src_h;
> }
>
> static int intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> @@ -746,6 +736,11 @@ static void intel_fbc_update_state_cache(struct
> intel_crtc *crtc,
> cache->crtc.hsw_bdw_pixel_rate = crtc_state-
> >pixel_rate;
>
> cache->plane.rotation = plane_state->base.rotation;
> + /*
> + * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
> + * the 90/270 degree plane rotation cases (to match the
> + * GTT mapping), hence no need to account for rotation here.
> + */
> cache->plane.src_w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.src)
> >> 16;
> cache->plane.src_h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src)
> >> 16;
> cache->plane.visible = plane_state->base.visible;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
