On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Enable MIPI IO WA for BXT DSI as per bspec and > program the DSI regulators. > > v2: Moved IO enable to pre-enable as per Mika's > review comments. Also reused the existing register > definition for BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON. > > v3: Added Programming the DSI regulators as per disable/enable > sequences. > > v4: Restricting regulator changes to BXT as suggested by > Jani/Mika This applies to BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON changes as well. One other question inline. > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 00970aa..0a9ad44 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -1553,6 +1553,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells { > _MMIO(_BXT_PHY_CH(phy, ch, reg_ch0, reg_ch1)) > > #define BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON _MMIO(0x138090) > +#define MIPIO_RST_CTRL (1 << 2) > > #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_A 0x64C00 > #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_B 0x64C10 > @@ -8301,6 +8302,12 @@ enum { > #define _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL 0x6B8C0 > #define BXT_MIPI_PORT_CTRL(tc) _MMIO_MIPI(tc, _BXT_MIPIA_PORT_CTRL, _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL) > > +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG _MMIO(0x160020) > +#define STAP_SELECT (1 << 0) > + > +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL _MMIO(0x160054) > +#define HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT (1 << 0) > + > #define DPI_ENABLE (1 << 31) /* A + C */ > #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT 27 > #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK (0xf << 27) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > index 16732e7..4dc1293 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev); > struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); > enum port port; > + u32 val; > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); > > @@ -558,6 +559,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder); > intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder, pipe_config); > > + /* Add MIPI IO reset programming for modeset */ > + val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON); > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON, > + val | MIPIO_RST_CTRL); > + > intel_dsi_prepare(encoder, pipe_config); > > /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */ > @@ -575,6 +581,14 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > I915_WRITE(DSPCLK_GATE_D, val); > } > > + /* Power up DSI regulator */ > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) { > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT); > + val = I915_READ(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL); > + val &= ~HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT; > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, val); Why does this specific change warrant a read-modify-write when the other regulator changes in this patch do a full register write? Also, the enable and disable sequences seem a bit asymmetric with these changes, i.e. you enable and disable things in different steps of the sequences. That's a bit surprising. (These might have an answer in bspec, but I don't seem to be able to access that right now.) BR, Jani. > + } > + > /* put device in ready state */ > intel_dsi_device_ready(encoder); > > @@ -707,6 +721,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev); > struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); > + u32 val; > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); > > @@ -714,8 +729,18 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > > intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder); > > + val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON); > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON, > + val & ~MIPIO_RST_CTRL); > + > intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder); > > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) { > + /* Power down DSI regulator to save power */ > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT); > + I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT); > + } > + > if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) { > u32 val; -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx