On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 14:46 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 12:53 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > > > > > == Series Details == > > > > > > Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/DMC/GLK: Load DMC on GLK > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16926/ > > > State : failure > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Series 16926v1 Series without cover letter > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16926/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > > > Test drv_module_reload: > > > Subgroup basic-reload-inject: > > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7500u) > > [ 33.108496] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6400 at > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:4254 i915_gem_suspend+0x181/0x190 [i915] > > [ 33.108498] WARN_ON(dev_priv->gt.awake) > > [ 33.108499] Modules linked in: > > [ 33.108501] i915(-) x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp > > crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec_hdmi > > snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep mei_me > > snd_hda_core mei snd_pcm e1000e ptp pps_core i2c_hid [last unloaded: > > snd_hda_intel] > > [ 33.108519] CPU: 2 PID: 6400 Comm: drv_module_relo Tainted: > > G U 4.9.0-CI-Patchwork_3338+ #1 > > [ 33.108521] Hardware name: GIGABYTE GB-BKi7A-7500/MFLP7AP-00, BIOS F1 > > 07/27/2016 > > [ 33.108522] ffffc90000547d18 ffffffff81435b05 ffffc90000547d68 > > 0000000000000000 > > [ 33.108527] ffffc90000547d58 ffffffff8107e4d6 0000109e00000000 > > ffff88025c620000 > > [ 33.108530] 0000000000000000 ffff88025c620068 ffffffffa013f4c0 > > 0000000000000000 > > [ 33.108534] Call Trace: > > [ 33.108540] [<ffffffff81435b05>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 > > [ 33.108543] [<ffffffff8107e4d6>] __warn+0xc6/0xe0 > > [ 33.108547] [<ffffffff8107e53a>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 > > [ 33.108572] [<ffffffffa0051601>] i915_gem_suspend+0x181/0x190 [i915] > > [ 33.108589] [<ffffffffa000ef4e>] i915_driver_unload+0x1e/0x190 [i915] > > [ 33.108608] [<ffffffffa0018b24>] i915_pci_remove+0x14/0x20 [i915] > > [ 33.108611] [<ffffffff81489aa4>] pci_device_remove+0x34/0xb0 > > [ 33.108614] [<ffffffff81588eec>] __device_release_driver+0x9c/0x150 > > [ 33.108617] [<ffffffff81589a66>] driver_detach+0xb6/0xc0 > > [ 33.108619] [<ffffffff81588983>] bus_remove_driver+0x53/0xd0 > > [ 33.108621] [<ffffffff8158a527>] driver_unregister+0x27/0x50 > > [ 33.108623] [<ffffffff81488445>] pci_unregister_driver+0x25/0x70 > > [ 33.108652] [<ffffffffa00fd8a4>] i915_exit+0x1a/0x71 [i915] > > [ 33.108655] [<ffffffff8111a813>] SyS_delete_module+0x193/0x1e0 > > [ 33.108658] [<ffffffff81827c6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1 > > [ 33.108660] ---[ end trace 247dfc1ad299c432 ]--- > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98670 > > > > > > > > Test pm_rpm: > > > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state: > > > pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) > > > Subgroup basic-rte: > > > pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) > > Out > > IGT-Version: 1.17-g38bffd9 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.9.0-CI-Patchwork_3338+ x86_64) > > Runtime PM support: 1 > > PC8 residency support: 0 > > Stack trace: > > #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101] > > #1 [main+0x2514] > > #2 [__libc_start_main+0xf0] > > #3 [_start+0x29] > > #4 [<unknown>+0x29] > > Subtest basic-rte: FAIL (10.053s) > > Err > > (pm_rpm:9532) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_subtest, file > > pm_rpm.c:705: > > (pm_rpm:9532) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: wait_for_suspended() > > Subtest basic-rte failed. > > **** DEBUG **** > > (pm_rpm:9532) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_subtest, file > > pm_rpm.c:705: > > (pm_rpm:9532) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: wait_for_suspended() > > > > Is this related to the gt.awake WARN? Looking at CI history, it seems the > > three > > tests always fail together. > No. The message is from an earlier incarnation of the module (i.e. if it > does correlates, it is a bug in module loading not sanitizing hw state), > and https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/fi-kbl-7500u.html disagrees with you. I shouldn't have said always. I was looking at that page, but only considered the fails of basic-reload-inject that had a dmesg-warn type of fail. And that is very small sample of 2. Anyway, thanks for the explanation. Ander _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
