Re: [PATCH] Another flavour of for_each_engine_masked()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09/16 15:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
This macro was recently updated to skip testing for non-existent or
uninteresting engines by using ffs() to directly find the next engine of
interest. However, it required the introduction of a caller-provided
temporary variable, which some people regard as inelegant. So, this
patch provides another variant, which still uses the fast-skip mechanism
but without requiring the temporary, for the cost of a slight increase
in code size (~20 bytes per callsite).

Slight? Next.
-Chris

106 bytes out of 1166488; that's 0.009% or 91ppm.
The adjective "slight" definitely applies :)

.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux