On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:23:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> A side effect of removing the midlayer from driver loading was the loss
> of a useful message announcing to userspace that i915 had successfully
> started, e.g.:
>
> [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20160425 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
>
> Reported-by: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 8f460e2c78f2 ("drm/i915: Demidlayer driver loading")
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: drm-intel-fixes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 6db1869e2c97..01757369d2d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1263,6 +1263,11 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>
> intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
>
> + /* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
> + DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
> + driver.name, driver.major, driver.minor, driver.patchlevel,
> + driver.date, pci_name(pdev), dev_priv->drm.primary->index);
> +
> intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.9.3
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
