Re: drm/i915: Check GuC load status for Host to GuC action and SLPC status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the review Deepak.

Have incorporated the changes and will send in next series.


On 8/20/2016 10:40 AM, Deepak S wrote:


On 20/08/16 10:39 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Host to GuC actions should not be invoked when GuC isn't loaded hence
add early return in i915_guc_action if GuC load status is not SUCCESS.
Also, SLPC status has to be linked with GuC load status to make sure
SLPC actions get invoked when GuC is loaded.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 5 +++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h           | 4 ++++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 680d9b4..27c937b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static inline bool host2guc_action_response(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  int i915_guc_action(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 *data, u32 len)
  {
      struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+    struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &guc->guc_fw;
+
remove the blank line
      u32 status;
      int i;
      int ret;
@@ -85,6 +87,9 @@ int i915_guc_action(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 *data, u32 len)
      if (WARN_ON(len < 1 || len > 15))
          return -EINVAL;
  +    if (WARN_ON(guc_fw->guc_fw_load_status != GUC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS))
+        return -ENODEV;
+
      intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
        dev_priv->guc.action_count += 1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index c46d619..71936dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1694,8 +1694,12 @@ bool chv_phy_powergate_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy, static inline int intel_slpc_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
+    struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
      int ret = 0;
  +    if (guc_fw->guc_fw_load_status != GUC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
+        return 0;
+
Since we are initializing ret=0, I think can do "return ret" right?
      if (dev_priv->guc.slpc.vma && dev_priv->guc.slpc.enabled)
          ret = 1;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux