On 8/19/2016 11:48 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:13:14PM +0530, akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
+static int i915_guc_log_control_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = data;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+
+ if (!dev_priv->guc.log.vma)
+ return -EINVAL;
return -ENODEV;
Fine will change the return code.
+
+ *val = i915.guc_log_level;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int i915_guc_log_control_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = data;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+ int ret;
if (!dev_priv->guc.log.vma)
return -ENODEV;
you don't need struct_mutex to check for its existence.
Fine will lock the struct_mutex after the NULL vma check.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx