Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] svm support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:03PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Now when fences got merged I reworked the series. It is now much
> smaller in size. Some items are still missing like error state recording,
> fault handling, documentation and in fences.

What's the plan for KMS integration?

We didn't like using userptr for framebuffer objects for the reason the
backing pages do not perist beyond the process (or mmap).

So create regular objects for KMS and CPU mmap them for SVM use?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux