On ma, 2016-08-15 at 11:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:59:09PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > > > > > > When we bump the MRU access tracking on set-to-gtt, we need to not only > > > bump the primary GGTT VMA but all partials as well. Similarly we want to > > > bump the MRU access for when unpinning an object from the scanout. > > Refer to the list as LRU in the commit title and message to avoid confusion. > Still disagree. We are adjusting the MRU entity, the code always has and > then evicting from the LRU. I would not use the abbreviation MRU when discussing LRU scheme, but it's only the commit message so I can live with it. Regards, Joonas > -Chris > -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
