On pe, 2016-08-12 at 11:28 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Since commit 43566dedde54 ("drm/i915: Broaden application of > set-domain(GTT)") we allowed objects to be in the GTT domain, but unbound. > Therefore removing the GTT cache domain when removing the GGTT vma is no > longer semantically correct. > > An unfortunate side-effect is we lose the wondrously named > i915_gem_object_finish_gtt(), not to be confused with > i915_gem_gtt_finish_object()! > Does what it promises. Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx