Since the intel_engine_init_seqno() is shared by all engine submission backends, move it out of the legacy intel_ringbuffer.c and into the new home for common routines, intel_engine_cs.c Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 42 --------------------------------- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c index 7104dec5e893..829624571ca4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c @@ -161,6 +161,48 @@ cleanup: return ret; } +void intel_engine_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915; + + /* Our semaphore implementation is strictly monotonic (i.e. we proceed + * so long as the semaphore value in the register/page is greater + * than the sync value), so whenever we reset the seqno, + * so long as we reset the tracking semaphore value to 0, it will + * always be before the next request's seqno. If we don't reset + * the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all + * future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption). + */ + if (IS_GEN6(dev_priv) || IS_GEN7(dev_priv)) { + I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0); + I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0); + if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv)) + I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_2(engine->mmio_base), 0); + } + if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dev_priv->semaphore_obj; + struct page *page = i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page(obj, 0); + void *semaphores = kmap(page); + memset(semaphores + GEN8_SEMAPHORE_OFFSET(engine->id, 0), + 0, I915_NUM_ENGINES * gen8_semaphore_seqno_size); + kunmap(page); + } + memset(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0, + sizeof(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno)); + + intel_write_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX, seqno); + if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier) + engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine); + engine->last_submitted_seqno = seqno; + + engine->hangcheck.seqno = seqno; + + /* After manually advancing the seqno, fake the interrupt in case + * there are any waiters for that seqno. + */ + intel_engine_wakeup(engine); +} + void intel_engine_init_hangcheck(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) { memset(&engine->hangcheck, 0, sizeof(engine->hangcheck)); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index c89aea55bc10..6008d54b9152 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -2314,48 +2314,6 @@ int intel_ring_cacheline_align(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req) return 0; } -void intel_engine_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno) -{ - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915; - - /* Our semaphore implementation is strictly monotonic (i.e. we proceed - * so long as the semaphore value in the register/page is greater - * than the sync value), so whenever we reset the seqno, - * so long as we reset the tracking semaphore value to 0, it will - * always be before the next request's seqno. If we don't reset - * the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all - * future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption). - */ - if (IS_GEN6(dev_priv) || IS_GEN7(dev_priv)) { - I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0); - I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0); - if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv)) - I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_2(engine->mmio_base), 0); - } - if (dev_priv->semaphore_obj) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dev_priv->semaphore_obj; - struct page *page = i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page(obj, 0); - void *semaphores = kmap(page); - memset(semaphores + GEN8_SEMAPHORE_OFFSET(engine->id, 0), - 0, I915_NUM_ENGINES * gen8_semaphore_seqno_size); - kunmap(page); - } - memset(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0, - sizeof(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno)); - - intel_write_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX, seqno); - if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier) - engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine); - engine->last_submitted_seqno = seqno; - - engine->hangcheck.seqno = seqno; - - /* After manually advancing the seqno, fake the interrupt in case - * there are any waiters for that seqno. - */ - intel_engine_wakeup(engine); -} - static void gen6_bsd_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915; -- 2.8.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx