On 12/08/16 15:48, Goel, Akash wrote:
On 8/12/2016 8:12 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/08/16 07:25, akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx>
GuC firmware sends an interrupt to flush the log buffer when it becomes
half full, so Driver doesn't really need to sample the complete buffer
and can just copy only the newly written data by GuC into the local
buffer, i.e. as per the read & write pointer values.
Moreover the flush interrupt would generally come for one type of log
buffer, when it becomes half full, so at that time the other 2 types of
log buffer would comparatively have much lesser unread data in them.
In case of overflow reported by GuC, Driver do need to copy the entire
buffer as the whole buffer would contain the unread data.
v2: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 40
+++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 1ca1866..8e0f360 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -889,7 +889,8 @@ static void guc_read_update_log_buffer(struct
intel_guc *guc)
struct guc_log_buffer_state *log_buffer_state,
*log_buffer_snapshot_state;
struct guc_log_buffer_state log_buffer_state_local;
void *src_data_ptr, *dst_data_ptr;
- u32 i, buffer_size;
+ bool new_overflow;
+ u32 i, buffer_size, read_offset, write_offset, bytes_to_copy;
if (!guc->log.buf_addr)
return;
@@ -912,10 +913,13 @@ static void guc_read_update_log_buffer(struct
intel_guc *guc)
memcpy(&log_buffer_state_local, log_buffer_state,
sizeof(struct guc_log_buffer_state));
buffer_size = log_buffer_state_local.size;
+ read_offset = log_buffer_state_local.read_ptr;
+ write_offset = log_buffer_state_local.sampled_write_ptr;
guc->log.flush_count[i] +=
log_buffer_state_local.flush_to_file;
if (log_buffer_state_local.buffer_full_cnt !=
guc->log.prev_overflow_count[i]) {
Wrong alignment. You can try checkpatch.pl for all of those.
Sorry for all the alignment & indentation issues.
Should the above condition be written like this ?
if (log_buffer_state_local.buffer_full_cnt !=
guc->log.prev_overflow_count[i]) {
Yes, but checkpatch.pl is your friend. :)
+ new_overflow = 1;
true/false since it is a bool
fine will do that.
guc->log.total_overflow_count[i] +=
(log_buffer_state_local.buffer_full_cnt -
guc->log.prev_overflow_count[i]);
@@ -929,7 +933,8 @@ static void guc_read_update_log_buffer(struct
intel_guc *guc)
guc->log.prev_overflow_count[i] =
log_buffer_state_local.buffer_full_cnt;
DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("GuC log buffer overflow\n");
- }
+ } else
+ new_overflow = 0;
if (log_buffer_snapshot_state) {
/* First copy the state structure in local buffer */
@@ -941,13 +946,37 @@ static void guc_read_update_log_buffer(struct
intel_guc *guc)
* for consistency set the write pointer value to same
* value of sampled_write_ptr in the snapshot buffer.
*/
- log_buffer_snapshot_state->write_ptr =
- log_buffer_snapshot_state->sampled_write_ptr;
+ log_buffer_snapshot_state->write_ptr = write_offset;
log_buffer_snapshot_state++;
/* Now copy the actual logs */
memcpy(dst_data_ptr, src_data_ptr, buffer_size);
The confusing bit - the memcpy above still copies the whole buffer, no?
Really very sorry for this blooper.
No worries, it happens to everyone!
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
