On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 01:01:37PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ke, 2016-08-10 at 12:54 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Execbuf suffers from a coherency problem which in theory is handled by > > the prepare for direct access implemented by pwrite. The issue being not > > only is that function non-existent (implemented inline for pwrite) it is > > missing a barrier or two. > > I already provided review feedback for this series, so after that is > applied I'll proceed to review. Don't forget to CC me. Just added the r-b tags. I did not agree with the minor changes in the context of the larger series. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
