The existing code that accesses the "enable_guc_loading"
parameter uses explicit numerical values for the various
possibilities, including in one case relying on boolean
0/1 mapping to specific values (which could be confusing
for maintainers).
So this patch just provides and uses names for the values
representing the DEFAULT, DISABLED, PREFERRED, and MANDATORY
options that the user can select (-1, 0, 1, 2 respectively).
This should produce identical code to the previous version!
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 13 +++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index d15bac8..94db252 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -90,12 +90,26 @@ struct i915_guc_client {
uint64_t submissions[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
};
+/*
+ * These signed ranges represent user-requested preferences.
+ * Out-of-range values from the user will be clipped towards
+ * zero: any negative value is treated as -1, anything over 2
+ * is just 2. ANY user-supplied value also taints the kernel.
+ */
enum {
GUC_SUBMISSION_DEFAULT = -1,
GUC_SUBMISSION_DISABLED = 0,
GUC_SUBMISSION_PREFERRED,
GUC_SUBMISSION_MANDATORY
};
+enum {
+ FIRMWARE_LOAD_DEFAULT = -1,
+ FIRMWARE_LOAD_DISABLED = 0,
+ FIRMWARE_LOAD_PREFERRED,
+ FIRMWARE_LOAD_MANDATORY
+};
+
+/* These represent the actual firmware status */
enum intel_guc_fw_status {
GUC_FIRMWARE_FAIL = -1,
GUC_FIRMWARE_NONE = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 5128cbd..33d9770 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
intel_guc_fw_status_repr(guc_fw->guc_fw_load_status));
/* Loading forbidden, or no firmware to load? */
- if (!i915.enable_guc_loading) {
+ if (i915.enable_guc_loading == FIRMWARE_LOAD_DISABLED) {
err = 0;
goto fail;
} else if (fw_path == NULL) {
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
* nonfatal error (i.e. it doesn't prevent driver load, but
* marks the GPU as wedged until reset).
*/
- if (i915.enable_guc_loading > 1) {
+ if (i915.enable_guc_loading >= FIRMWARE_LOAD_MANDATORY) {
ret = -EIO;
} else if (i915.enable_guc_submission >= GUC_SUBMISSION_MANDATORY) {
ret = -EIO;
@@ -687,9 +687,10 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
const char *fw_path;
- /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
- if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
- i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
+ /* Any negative value means "use platform default" */
+ if (i915.enable_guc_loading <= FIRMWARE_LOAD_DEFAULT)
+ i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev) ?
+ FIRMWARE_LOAD_PREFERRED : FIRMWARE_LOAD_DISABLED;
if (i915.enable_guc_submission <= GUC_SUBMISSION_DEFAULT)
i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev) ?
GUC_SUBMISSION_PREFERRED : GUC_SUBMISSION_DISABLED;
@@ -718,7 +719,7 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
guc_fw->guc_fw_load_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
/* Early (and silent) return if GuC loading is disabled */
- if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
+ if (i915.enable_guc_loading == FIRMWARE_LOAD_DISABLED)
return;
if (fw_path == NULL)
return;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
