On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:18:15PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote: >> > Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx >> > <mailto:sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>> >> >> You're mailer wreaks havoc with your reviewed-by tags. Pleas fix this. >> >> >> > On 6/27/2016 8:10 PM, akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > > From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > Updated the i915_drpc_info debugfs with coarse power gating & forcewake >> > > info for Gen9. >> > > >> > > v2: Change all IS_GEN9() by gen >= 9 (Damien) > > For future reference, please use IS_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 for expressions > such as this. My bad for not spotting this until the patch got merged. > Fret not, however, I've got a few patches that'll clean this up :) David means INTEL_GEN(), not IS_GEN(). ;) BR, Jani. > > > Regards, David Weinehall > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
