On to, 2016-08-04 at 20:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Now that we pass along the expected interruptible nature for the > wait-for-idle, we do not need to modify the global > i915->mm.interruptible for this single call. (Only the immediate call to > i915_gem_wait_for_idle() takes the interruptible status as the other > action, dma_map_sg(), is independent of i915.ko) > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks far less hackish, good; Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
