On ke, 2016-08-03 at 13:04 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:56:39PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > static inline struct drm_i915_gem_request * > > i915_gem_active_get_rcu(const struct i915_gem_active *active) > Alternative name would be i915_gem_active_get_unlocked() > (Starting to get too unwieldy.) It's less confusing. I assume you intend to extend the rcu_read_lock() section? Regards, Joonas > -Chris > -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
