On Tue, 02 Aug 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I see the below call-trace with latest d-i-n, guess latest linux-next >> >> FWIW, "d-i-n" is ambiguous (drm-intel-next vs. drm-intel-nightly) and we >> don't use that ourselves. >> > > Oh, sorry with d-i-n I meant drm-intel-nightly. > Normally, I also point to the "integration manifest" > like...drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration > manifest. > You do not test d-i-n yourself? > Strange. We do not use the *acronym* "d-i-n" ourselves because it is ambiguous. drm-intel-nightly is our main test target. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
