On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:49:45AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ma, 2016-07-25 at 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Having ringbuf->ring point to an engine is confusing, so rename it once > > again to ring->engine. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I still do not see a connection between commit message and content, so > you could mentione renaming the function (which is all this patch > does). That's weird, I thought I had dropped this patch - it wasn't intended to be sent again as thinking about how this would look in an intel_legacy_submission.c says this is pointless churn. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
