On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > I believe you're thinking of: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/77191/ > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/77192/ > > Although they don't test for multiple rotation values... I guess you could just for (rotation = 0; rotation < 0x40; rotation++) if (!is_power_of_2(rotation & 0xf) || (rotation & ~supported) != 0) // expect failure } if you want to be really sure invalid crap won't get through. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
