On pe, 2016-07-15 at 12:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:08:05PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 01:47:34PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On pe, 2016-07-15 at 11:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +#define NO_WAITBOOST ERR_PTR(-1)
> > > This does not seem to be a very common idiom in kernel, just add flags
> > > maybe.
> > I find the special values for the client (including the existing NULL
> > client) much more informative.
> Is it more pleasant with...?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index bfec4a88707d..aedc15d46463 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ complete:
> *timeout = 0;
> }
>
> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rps) &&
> + if (IS_RPS_CLIENT(rps) &&
> req->fence.seqno == req->engine->last_submitted_seqno) {
> /* The GPU is now idle and this client has stalled.
> * Since no other client has submitted a request in the
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> index f7f497a07893..b3fe80d4eb63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>
> struct intel_rps_client;
I almost suggested #define RPS_CLIENT(n) ERR_PTR(-n), but this is
somewhat better already.
> #define NO_WAITBOOST ERR_PTR(-1)
> +#define IS_RPS_CLIENT(p) (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
>
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
