From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> At the moment HAS_GUC_UCODE == HAS_GUC == IS_GEN9 == (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen_mask & BIT(8)), which is true but not one. And module parameters are integers and not booleans so compiler will not normalize the value for us. Quick and easy fix for the GuC loading code and the whole area can be evaluated afterwards. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c index d925e2daeb24..72ea5b97e242 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c @@ -687,9 +687,9 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev) /* A negative value means "use platform default" */ if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0) - i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev); + i915.enable_guc_loading = !!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev); if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0) - i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev); + i915.enable_guc_submission = !!HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev); if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)) { fw_path = NULL; -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx