Quoting Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@xxxxxxxx>:
Le 13/11/2024 à 13:02:28+0100, Michael Menge a écritHi, Quoting Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@xxxxxxxx>: > Le 12/11/2024 à 15:57:19+0100, Jean Charles Delépine via Info a écrit > > Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@xxxxxxxx> écrivait (wrote) : > the mail is not posted by cyrus_shared_account but by the unauthenticated lmtp or delivery process.Ok. Understand.also the "p" acl for anyone is not as problematic, as it is only used for mails delivered by lmtp orOk. But in that case why in «normal» mailbox : user.toto we only need acl for toto and not anyone ? How cyrus will know «it's toto» who going to use lmtp to deliver the email in the «user.toto» mailbox ?
i was not sure my self and suspect that it is an implicit acl.I had a peek the source code and it seems that the owner of sieve script is used, which is consistent with: no extra acls for mails delivered to the inbox or a folder by a sieve rule, but for mails that use plus addressing to deliver mail to a subfolder of user's
INBOX the users has to set an explicit "anyone" "p" acl on that folder
Of course it's not a big deal, I can live with acl “anyone p” on all my shared mailbox, it's just I find that very weird.the delivery binary. For Mails inserted by the APPEND or the COPY imap commands the "w" or "i" ALCs are checkedOk thanks.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Menge Tel.: (49) 7071 / 29-70316 Universität Tübingen Fax.: (49) 7071 / 29-5912Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung mail: michael.menge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wächterstraße 76 72074 Tübingen
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-Signatur
------------------------------------------ Cyrus: Info Permalink: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/T22db9b7c090b8bf6-M7e578883e0012d87b4e04a7c Delivery options: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/info/subscription
