Re: Xapian index size
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Info <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: Xapian index size
From
: a.lobanov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date
: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:40:41 -0400
In-reply-to
: <
17259679740.f5aAfbc.46058@composer.cyrus.topicbox.com
>
Reply-to
: Info <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Topicbox-delivery-id
: 2:cyrus:02f406ce-0e39-11eb-9ac9-159c9134e1fa:5a2fd7b8-0eef-11eb-b1da-c982292d11b0:M6ea3efcf66c85460fb0279f2:1:0EGnL58l5VufR5qxHytOug597eOcMzXi78_-s-eF5tA
Topicbox-message-uuid
: 705e7d1e-7043-11ef-978a-23142b2d11b0
Topicbox-policy-reasoning
: allow: sender is a member
An obvious addition.
Yes, index size decreases to expected 50% of source if I remove old index (rm *) and create completely new instead. Is it the indended maintenance method?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Xapian index size
From:
Jean Charles Delépine via Info
References
:
Xapian index size
From:
a . lobanov
Prev by Date:
Unable to login with cyr_expire
Next by Date:
Re: Xapian index size
Previous by thread:
Xapian index size
Next by thread:
Re: Xapian index size
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Cyrus SASL]
[Squirrel Mail]
[Asterisk PBX]
[Video For Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[gtk]
[KDE]
[Gimp on Windows]
[Steve's Art]
