I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the "checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
From: Gabriele Bulfon <gbulfon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: info-cyrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the "checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From: Gabriele Bulfon <gbulfon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: info-cyrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
==3.0.2==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs)
So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
Thanx!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.comQuantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
