>>>>> "SM" == Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxx> writes: SM> As I'm currently working on a 2.5.x release of our Invoca RPMs I'm SM> wondering if it would make sense to just go with 3.0 beta? The work SM> on 2.5.x will still take some more time because it's a big change SM> with the new build system, new functionality and support for new SM> systems with systemd. I'm actually going to be putting some work into the Fedora packages soon. Of course, they already support systemd so that may be useful to you, even though they're only at 2.4.something. Although there are going to be some differences (Fedora has some new tools for self-signed certificate generation, for example) it would be nice if the RPMs didn't diverge too much, especially in terms of file location (which I understanding is changing a bit in 3.0 anyway). For now I'm just doing this work because I need 2.5.x packages locally and I'm not entirely sure they'll make it into Fedora, but they might. - J< ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
