On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana <brong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:We only set quotas on individual mailboxes so that wouldn't be a problem. We also don't have sieve scripts except per-mailbox, so ditto there.
Sounds like you'll be fine.
I'm not quite clear though about the global sharing thing. Does this mean, for example, that if one user wants to share a mailbox with another user, its name has to be unique on the entire system? We would have users who would want to only share with other users in their domain.
No, the per-user namespace is still fine - users can still share with other users in their own domain - just currently it is technically impossible to share with users in other domains right now - because the mailbox naming is not RFC compliant, so it's not compatible with real IMAP client, only with Cyrus management tools.
Since we support a single-realm Kerberos setup we only use usernames not email address login. Does that make any difference here since there appears to be an issue with the domain part?
There's nothing wrong with running without domains still - there would still be support for virtdomains: off, or else for a single defaultdomain: "example.com" which would be appended/stripped as appropriate.
Bron.
--
Bron Gondwana
brong@xxxxxxxxxxx
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
