Hi, Quoting Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,
[...]
Search for addresses and subject should in theory be reasonably fast because the results should mostly come from the cache. We also use squatter, which should help with the body searches. However, each mailbox is currently squatted roughly every 24 hours. With busy mailboxes I presume that leaves a large window where search will have to fall back to searching every message in that mailbox, right?
AFAIK the index created by squatter is used to exclude mails that don't contain the search pattern, so an outdated index is still of use.Only the new messages and the files the index could not exclude will be searched.
Running squatter more often will result in more IO traffic during the daytime.
We are looking into using metapartitions to move all the relevant
files to SSD to make access to cache and squat files faster, but
that won't help with "outdated" squat files, right? Would it make
sense to squat his mailboxes more often?
Other suggestions?
Cheers
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M.Menge Tel.: (49) 7071/29-70316 Universität Tübingen Fax.: (49) 7071/29-5912Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung mail: michael.menge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wächterstraße 76 72074 Tübingen
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Signatur
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
